Smoking and Meat Both Cause Cancer

Onko tarkoitusperä hyödyllinen vai haitallinen?

HYÖDYLLINEN HAITALLINEN

Translate to other languages

English Dutch French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

Smoking and Meat Both Cause Cancer

Taustatiedot
This is a PETA (animal rights group) press release that compares letting your child eat meat to letting them smoke because they both increase the risk of heart disease and cancer.
Käytetty tekniikka
Simplify Ideas
Tämä on mediavaikuttamista, koska
This is propaganda that links half-truths. In this case, correlation does not imply causation.

Comments

  1. user-avatar
    Andreja
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 00:33
    Andreja
    This is very baiested because meat is beneficial is to our life. This is a form of name calling. Because of that, people will believe that meat is bad, so they will become vegan because of a lie. Also it is comparing meat to smoking.
  1. user-avatar
    Samantha
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 00:45
    Samantha
    Smoking is very harmful, especially to a child's body.
  1. user-avatar
    Crash
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 00:50
    Crash
    Kind of beneficial

    Fear technique

    Not effective
  1. user-avatar
    jadra
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 00:56
    jadra
    fear is the technique

    neutural
    effective
  1. user-avatar
    sam and dana
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 03:51
    sam and dana
    Beneficial
    Fear
    Probably effective
  1. user-avatar
    kaerora
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 03:54
    kaerora
    This is an ok propaganda because it is comparing how meat and cigars are both cancer causing and it is alarming the readers that neither of these are benificial for use.
  1. user-avatar
    mikeandchelly
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 03:58
    mikeandchelly
    We think it is fear because it is comparing meat to smoking. This ad is not effective because a lot of people still eat meat.
  1. user-avatar
    vico muniz
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 07:04
    vico muniz
    I think this type of propaganda is useful because the people need meat and not the cigarette so I think this is about ideas of each person has.
  1. user-avatar
    Adrian Rodriguez Gzz
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 11:54
    Adrian Rodriguez Gzz
    This type of propaganda is telling you that the kids will learn the things that you do, if you do bad things the kids will think that the things that you do are ok and they will do it also. Not only doing bad things, also the health, if you eat unhealthy food, your kids will also eat unhealthy food and will have problems.
  1. user-avatar
    Paulina Puente
    Ti, 09/29/2015 - 12:14
    Paulina Puente
    I rate this propaganda like this because I think it's an efficient way to make people understand about the risks of eating meat, this propaganda is using the kid as a way to make it more relatable and easier to connect emotionally with the parents, the best way to guard yourself from this kind of propaganda is by realizing that PETA strategy is to use the child to make people remember their kids and make them aware of the risks.
  1. user-avatar
    ladycrago
    Ke, 09/30/2015 - 05:12
    ladycrago
    It was more harmful, it was not very effective, What does smoking have to do with going vegan. It was more fear.
  1. user-avatar
    bailey
    Ke, 09/30/2015 - 05:15
    bailey
    It was more harmful.
  1. user-avatar
    REGINOLD
    Ke, 09/30/2015 - 05:15
    REGINOLD
    This is a effective way of using fear by linking the meat to smoking but it is not beneficial because meat is needed to give you iron.
  1. user-avatar
    Jason
    Ke, 12/04/2024 - 20:26
    Jason
    In this work, PETA implies that meat-eating is just as harmful as smoking. There is no citation for this claim, and evidence shows that meat is beneficial in a child's diet.

    Harmful, somewhat effective, appeal to emotions (fear, disgust), outright lies (that eating meat is net harmful)

Share Your Ideas

CAPTCHA
Kuva CAPTCHA
Kirjoita kuvassa näkyvät merkit.