An article telling you how China's democracy works better than the Western one

Czy to korzystne, czy szkodliwe?

KORZYSTNE SZKODLIWE

Translate to other languages

English Dutch French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

Two sessions will not dodge tough issues

Informacje ogólne
The article argues that China's democracy works better than the Western parliamentary checks-and-balances-based democracy, and the former focuses more on the real needs of the people. The article is written by and published on Global Times in early Mar. 2019.
używana technika
Attack Opponents
To jest propaganda, ponieważ
The article puts Chinese democracy into comparison with Western democracy, arguing the former focuses on people's long-term wellbeing while the later leads to polarisation and division. The article defending Chinese democracy with China's economic growth as the evidence and attack on Western political system as a polarising factor.
It is harmful. This short article is misleading and superficial because it attacks modern democracy while boasts about Chinese authoritarianism based on no empirical evidence and without discussing the very essences of the two systems.
Zródło
Global Times

Comments

No Comments Yet

Share Your Ideas

CAPTCHA
CAPTCHA obrazkowa
Wprowadź znaki widoczne na obrazku.
To pytanie sprawdza czy jesteś człowiekiem i zapobiega wysyłaniu spamu.